Historic Crime Drop Predates Trump — Is America Better Yet?

The United States really is seeing a historic decline in violent crime. The harder question is who gets the credit.

By Roberto Zapatero | Is America Better Yet?

August 21, 2026

Violent crime is falling across the United States. That is not political spin. It is supported by the government's own crime statistics.

But President Donald Trump and Republicans are making a second claim: that their policies caused the decline and that the results are a reason voters should keep Republicans in power.

The first claim is supported by strong evidence.

The second is not nearly so clear.

The crime drop is real

The FBI reported on August 14 that violent crime fell an estimated 9.3% nationwide in 2025. Murder and non-negligent manslaughter fell 18.1%, robbery fell 18.5%, rape fell 7.6%, and aggravated assault fell 7.2%. The 2025 murder rate fell to 4.1 per 100,000 people, tying 1955 and 1956 for the lowest rate in the FBI series. More than 17,000 agencies covering about 96% of the U.S. population supplied data.

That is remarkably good news.

The decline also appears to be continuing in 2026. The Council on Criminal Justice, examining 36 large cities, found homicides during the first half of 2026 were 18% lower than during the same period in 2025. It found nine of 13 measured offenses had declined.

Americans should be able to recognize that improvement without first deciding which political party deserves the credit.

The decline did not begin with Trump

This is where the political argument becomes more complicated.

Donald Trump returned to office on January 20, 2025.

But the FBI reported that violent crime had already fallen 1.7% in 2022, 3% in 2023, and 4.5% in 2024. Murder fell 6.1% in 2022, 11.6% in 2023, and another 14.9% in 2024.

The Council on Criminal Justice puts the beginning of the sustained homicide decline in the second half of 2022.

That was more than two years before Trump's second inauguration.

The council makes an unusually important warning in its own report: its findings are not evidence that any particular policy succeeded or failed. Researchers say there is no single, easy explanation for the historic decline. Possible contributors include changes in policing, technology, criminal-justice practices, demographics, behavior and broader changes in American society.

That means the timeline can establish something important, but limited:

Violent crime fell substantially while Joe Biden was president, and the decline became even larger during Trump's first year back in office.

It does not establish that either president caused it.

The White House is making a much stronger claim

The Trump White House has gone beyond saying crime fell during his presidency.

It has called the continuing decline the “Trump Effect” and says Trump's law-and-order agenda is responsible. In July, the White House said the decline was the direct result of Trump's enforcement policies.

The message is also being used politically.

At an August 14 appearance at the Nassau County Police Academy in New York, Trump highlighted the FBI numbers while promoting Republican candidates ahead of the November midterm elections. Reuters reported that the president attributed the crime reduction to his law-and-order and immigration policies. The "" Associated Press described the event as aimed in part at helping Republicans in competitive congressional races.

There is nothing unusual about a president taking credit for good news that occurs on his watch.

But taking credit is different from proving cause.

What about the federal crackdown?

There has clearly been a major change in the visible presence and tactics of federal law enforcement.

Masked federal immigration officers, sometimes wearing tactical equipment and carrying firearms, have become common sights during immigration operations in several American cities. ICE and the administration say masks help protect officers and their families from threats and doxxing. Critics argue that unidentified officers make accountability more difficult and can frighten communities.

That debate is real.

It is also largely separate from the FBI's violent-crime statistics.

The FBI's national violent-crime measure consists of murder, rape, robbery and aggravated assault. Immigration violations are not one of those four categories.

Removing people for immigration violations, increasing immigration arrests or placing armed federal personnel in a city therefore does not, by itself, demonstrate why murder or robbery declined.

A federal operation might reduce particular crimes in a particular place. That is a testable question.

But it cannot simply be assumed from the national numbers.

Even Washington does not provide an easy answer

The administration frequently points to Washington, D.C., where Trump deployed the ational Guard and expanded federal enforcement.

Crime there has fallen sharply. During the first half of 2026, homicide was down about 41%, carjacking 63%, and motor-vehicle theft 54% compared with the first half of 2025, according to the Council on Criminal Justice.

Those numbers deserve attention.

But they still do not isolate a single cause. Some crimes fell while aggravated assault rose 45% and gun assault rose 13% in the same analysis. And Washington was part of a broader national decline occurring in cities with very different governments and policing policies.

That does not prove the federal intervention had no effect.

It means the available figures cannot tell us how much of the decline it caused.

“Back the blue” also has a complicated record

There is another reason to be careful about simple campaign slogans.

The Trump administration has expanded some law-enforcement programs while reducing others.

The Justice Department's 2025 COPS Hiring Program awarded about $161 million to 228 state, local and tribal agencies, supporting the hiring of 1,155 officers and deputies. That is direct federal support for local policing.

At the same time, the Justice Department canceled at least 365 previously awarded grants in April 2025. Those grants supported a mixture of programs, including police mental-health services, crime-victim programs, violence prevention and other criminal-justice work. Later litigation involved about $800 million in canceled grants.

And Reuters reported in April 2026 that the Justice Department had about 11,200 fewer employees than before Trump's second term. The reductions included roughly 2,600 FBI employees, substantial cuts at the **Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives**, and losses at the Drug Enforcement Administration, Bureau of Prisons 6and other Justice Department divisions.

That number should not be described as 11,200 police officers. Most were not local police officers, and they performed many different jobs.

But it does show why broad claims that one party simply “funded the police” while the other “defunded the police” deserve scrutiny.

The actual federal record is more complicated.

What the evidence allows us to say

There is little doubt that something important is happening in American public safety.

Fewer people are being murdered. Fewer robberies are being reported. Violent crime is substantially lower than it was during the pandemic-era surge.

Those are real human lives behind the percentages.

Trump became president during that decline. During his first full calendar year back in office, it accelerated dramatically.

His administration may eventually be shown to have contributed to part of that improvement. Specific federal operations, arrests, prosecutions, police grants or partnerships could have measurable effects.

But the national crime numbers alone cannot establish that.

The decline began well before Trump's second presidency. It has occurred under Democratic and Republican mayors, governors and prosecutors. It has continued in places using very different approaches to policing.

The strongest independent crime-trend analysis available today says there is no single explanation.

That leaves voters with a simpler distinction to make.

“Violent crime fell under President Trump” is a fact.

“Violent crime fell because of President Trump” is a claim that still requires evidence.

When politicians ask voters for credit, the public should be shown the difference.

Sources

• Federal Bureau of Investigation, 2025 Reported Crimes in the Nation, Aug. 14, 2026.
• Federal Bureau of Investigation, Crime in the Nation reports for 2022, 2023 and 2024.
• Council on Criminal Justice, Crime Trends in U.S. Cities: Mid-Year 2026 Update, July 2026.
• Council on Criminal Justice, Washington, D.C. crime analysis, Aug. 2026.
• The White House, statements attributing recent crime declines to the Trump administration.
• Reuters and Associated Press, reporting on Trump's use of crime figures during the 2026 midterm campaign.
• Reuters and Associated Press, reporting on masked federal immigration-enforcement operations and the debate over their use.
• U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office, 2025 COPS Hiring Program awards.
• Reuters and Associated Press, reporting on canceled Justice Department grants.
• Reuters, Justice Department workforce reductions, April 23, 2026.

Excerpt: Violent crime really has fallen to historic levels. But the decline started years before Donald Trump returned to office, and current evidence does not establish that Republican or Trump administration policies caused the national drop.

Suggested tags: Violent Crime, FBI Crime Statistics, Donald Trump, 2026 Midterms, Policing, Justice Department, Public Safety, Fact Check

AI assistance disclosure: Artificial intelligence was used to assist with research organization, drafting, editing and source verification. AI output is not treated as evidence. Consequential factual claims were checked against cited government records and independent reporting.

I write for you,

— Roberto

isamericabetteryet.org